<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Living in Stereo</title>
	<link>http://www.michaelchorost.com/blog/2008/04/18/living-in-stereo/</link>
	<description>Michael Chorost, author of &#60;i&#62;Rebuilt&#60;/i&#62;, on cochlear implants</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Chorost</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelchorost.com/blog/2008/04/18/living-in-stereo/#comment-757</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Chorost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 05:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.michaelchorost.com/blog/2008/04/18/living-in-stereo/#comment-757</guid>
		<description>Sam, it's always easier to talk with someone in person than on the phone.  But as long as a person on the phone is speaking clearly and the connection is good, I can understand them without difficulty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam, it&#8217;s always easier to talk with someone in person than on the phone.  But as long as a person on the phone is speaking clearly and the connection is good, I can understand them without difficulty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam alapati</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelchorost.com/blog/2008/04/18/living-in-stereo/#comment-754</link>
		<dc:creator>sam alapati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 00:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.michaelchorost.com/blog/2008/04/18/living-in-stereo/#comment-754</guid>
		<description>Michael,

Does this mean, then, that there is no or little differnce in your comprehsension of a telephone conversation as compared to a face to face chat?

Thanks,
sam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>Does this mean, then, that there is no or little differnce in your comprehsension of a telephone conversation as compared to a face to face chat?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
sam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Chorost</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelchorost.com/blog/2008/04/18/living-in-stereo/#comment-726</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Chorost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 21:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.michaelchorost.com/blog/2008/04/18/living-in-stereo/#comment-726</guid>
		<description>Steve, you'd be surprised how often I get asked that.  I use it to supplement what I hear - as a way of resolving ambiguous phonemes.  But I suspect that *everyone* does that.  

Just so you know, lipreading is a very poor means of communication.  Try turning off the volume on your TV and see how far you get.

Still, when I was totally deaf for three months back in 2001, I was surprised how well I did with lipreading.  I was able to have reasonably coherent conversations with people.  But I couldn't have done it without the trickle of sound I had from my barely functioning right ear.  Also, I could only communicate with people one-on-one.  Group conversations were simply impossible. 

Lipreading helps, as does facial expression and context.  But it's strictly an adjunct.  Most of the information I get comes from actual hearing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, you&#8217;d be surprised how often I get asked that.  I use it to supplement what I hear - as a way of resolving ambiguous phonemes.  But I suspect that *everyone* does that.  </p>
<p>Just so you know, lipreading is a very poor means of communication.  Try turning off the volume on your TV and see how far you get.</p>
<p>Still, when I was totally deaf for three months back in 2001, I was surprised how well I did with lipreading.  I was able to have reasonably coherent conversations with people.  But I couldn&#8217;t have done it without the trickle of sound I had from my barely functioning right ear.  Also, I could only communicate with people one-on-one.  Group conversations were simply impossible. </p>
<p>Lipreading helps, as does facial expression and context.  But it&#8217;s strictly an adjunct.  Most of the information I get comes from actual hearing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Royer</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelchorost.com/blog/2008/04/18/living-in-stereo/#comment-725</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Royer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.michaelchorost.com/blog/2008/04/18/living-in-stereo/#comment-725</guid>
		<description>I haven't had a chance to read the latest piece; hit me up when you're in DC.  Dinner we must.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t had a chance to read the latest piece; hit me up when you&#8217;re in DC.  Dinner we must.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelchorost.com/blog/2008/04/18/living-in-stereo/#comment-723</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 05:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.michaelchorost.com/blog/2008/04/18/living-in-stereo/#comment-723</guid>
		<description>Nice article.  

I've known you to be able to listen to the radio and communicate on the phone.  But I'm curious.  Do you use lip reading often, occasionally, or rarely?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve known you to be able to listen to the radio and communicate on the phone.  But I&#8217;m curious.  Do you use lip reading often, occasionally, or rarely?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
